Talk:Federal Emergency Management Agency

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Federal Emergency Management Agency article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States: Government High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).

Disaster management Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Akek13.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for worse preparations in advance of Irma

CNN reported, Sept, 7 2017, that people are waiting in lines for hours to receive 8 sandbags in order to protect their home in the Orlando, Florida area from flooding. Somewhere in the article, FEMA owns the onset of hysteria the is roiling the panicking public on what to do. I nominate this as the number 1 entry on a proposed section titled, "Misfires in Management". Meanwhile, elsewhere in Florida people are not able to get gasoline because stations are running out. Furthermore, with onslaught of impending disaster; "running around in circles" might be the most appropriate phraseology to refer to the Irma event. Governor Scott has advised to listen to local officials in their area but made no mention of complying by obtaining sandbags via their automobiles. --Wikipietime (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sept 8 2017 update; CNN segment on sandbag operation at Merritt Island, Florida. It was stated that people have been waiting 5 hours for their 8 sandbags and wasting lots of gas in the process. The video showed a tent with two inmate striped individuals loading sandbags with a shovel as recipients waited in their cars for the allotment. The segment aired at 9:15 ish est. Perhaps the proposed section should be "Sandbagging Operations". Any thought or suggestions on this and how the local authorities are cooperating with national FEMA? As a part of Fema's mission, " FEMA provides funds for training of response personnel throughout the United States and its territories as part of the agency's preparedness effort" ; I was unable to find dispensing of sandbags to the public. Any help in citing the section would be appreciated. --Wikipietime (talk) 13:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, Florida Governor Scott failed to get the memo. http://www.tcpalm.com/story/news/local/indian-river-lagoon/health/2017/08/29/what-if-harvey-had-hit-here-lake-okeechobee-dike-could-overflow-fail-says-army-corps-engineers-spoke/608660001/

When he said it would not be a problem with impending Irma.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Federal Emergency Management Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/12/102827.shtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002988269&cpage=1
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120702010815/http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/srl/index.shtm to http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/srl/index.shtm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518082349/http://www.fema.gov/good_guidance/download/10260 to http://www.fema.gov/good_guidance/download/10260
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/GENERAL/Notices/05-5488order.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/GENERAL/Notices/order011206.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NOC stands for?

Section Response capabilities, says on National Response Coordination Center " FEMA maintains the NRCC as a functional component of the NOC " . "NOC" is an unexplained acronym that should be replaced or explained. 84.206.45.2 (talk) 09:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Not explained yet

--Fev 13:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fev (talk • contribs)

National Operations Center. See page 2. [1] Niteshift36 (talk) 18:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

National Operations Center. --Fev 16:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Federal Emergency Management Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:FEMA (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:44, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TN National Guard

TN did not send the troops abroad as only the President has the authority to deploy National guard abroad 173.224.1.26 (talk) 13:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]