Talk:Pornography laws by region

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pornography laws by region article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pornography High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A summary of this article appears in Pornography.

Requested move 15 September 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Pornography laws by region be renamed and moved to Restrictions on pornography.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Pornography laws by region → Restrictions on pornography – Someone may have a better idea for a rename, so I'm seeking input. The current formulation — "laws" – is not sufficiently precise (WP:PRECISION), limiting the scope of addressing, in addition to "laws" in the sense of de jure aspects, also the enforcement situation by governments.

For instance, South Korea is listed in the table as a country where production and distribution are prohibited, but appears nonetheless green in the accompanying map; China does not formally criminalise possession, yet there was a controversial 2002 incident of police breaking into a couple's home whilst they watched pornography, fining and jailing them (article in Chinese); in Egypt, there have been some statements by courts and prosecutors following the growth of Islamist politics in the immediate aftermath of the 2011 revolution, yet internet pornography is not blocked, unlike in some other Arab countries. Clearly, the article has been — and should be better — addressing both the de jure and quasi-legal situations. The present title yields undesired ambiguity.

Similar Wikipedia titles include Restrictions on TikTok in the United States and Restrictions on cell phone use while driving in the United States. It would make little sense to prefer e.g. "Legality of TikTok"/"Laws on TikTok in the United States" over its present title. Y. Dongchen (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: South Korea does not appear green in the accompanying map. It is de facto nevertheless a regulation of a very different nature that of Iran, despite being lumped into the non-specific category of "illegal". Y. Dongchen (talk) 14:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, "laws by region" implies a stand-alone list. I'm not sure if "Pornography laws by region" has been sufficiently discussed in secondary sources. Rather, it seems more appropriate for the legal prescriptions on pornography to be an aspect included in a broader article "Restrictions on pornography", which is amply discussed in secondary literature. Y. Dongchen (talk) 04:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Veracity of the choropleth map

I have appended Template:Additional citation needed to the choropleth map. Unless the depicted countries can be sourced, I will delete that map after some time. A new map would then have to be made if we wish to include one. No information at all is better than false or misleading information. Y. Dongchen (talk) 03:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I realise that another issue in the map is the arbitrary trichotomy without evidence of such nomenclature in secondary sources (see the subsequent talk page section "Original research"). Therefore I have removed the map. Y. Dongchen (talk) 04:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

The trichotomous characterisation of legal prescriptions on pornography — in this article, "Legal (with exceptions on extreme forms)", "Restricted" and "Illegal" — is an arbitrary construct. Unless that is a common modus operandi of secondary sources, this constitutes original research. Instead, I propose simply listing the specific laws in each country's row. Y. Dongchen (talk) 04:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]