Jump to content

User talk:The bellman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mary Jackson
Mary Jackson (1921–2005) was an American mathematician and aerospace engineer at the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics and its successor, NASA. She worked at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, for most of her career. She started as a computer at the segregated West Area Computing division in 1951. In 1958, after taking engineering classes, she became NASA's first black female engineer. Jackson had earned the most senior engineering title available by 1979 and realized she could not earn further promotions without becoming a supervisor. She accepted a demotion to become a manager of both NASA's federal women's program and the affirmative action program. Her work sought to influence the career paths of women in science, engineering, and mathematics positions at NASA. Jackson is one of the leading characters in the 2016 book Hidden Figures and one of the three protagonists in the book's film adaptation, released the same year. This NASA photograph of Jackson was taken in 1979.Photograph credit: NASA; restored by Adam Cuerden

Hi bellman, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~~~~. (Just so you know, some people won't pay attention to unsigned comments).

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

Above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

-- T.P.K. 13:23, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Cyclone Tracy

[edit]

Nah, not a problem if you want to put it back in. I just took it out because it didn't exist and I thought the content was covered in one of the World War II articles. If you create it, the best name would probably be something like 1942 bombing of Darwin but as it is a wartime event I may be wrong on that. Best thing to do would be integrate the details into one of the WW2 articles and link to that. -- Chuq 08:26, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hiya

[edit]

Welcome to Wikiproject Sydney! Good to have you on board :-) Please feel free to modify any content on the page as we're still formulating strategy/policy. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:35, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Stub notice on Strathfield

[edit]

Hi bellman, I'd prefer to keep the stub notice on this article until we can make it a "featured suburb". It could be that "stub" is the wrong work, however. - Ta bu shi da yu 09:03, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to keep it out of the article. Consensus (if you can say two people form a consensus!) is that it should be left out. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:57, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

References

[edit]

Hi bellman, I've moved References to User:The_bellman/References and made a redirect of References to Citation because discussing of policy should not be done in the main namespace. Though I do tend to agree with you on this matter! Just thought I'd let you know. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:55, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Expanding the coverage of Africa

[edit]

Having seen your comment under African Union on COTW I thought you might be interested to know (in case you haven't already heard) that there is a recently launched WikiProject aiming to improve several under-covered areas of the Wikipedia. African issues is one of the main priorities of this project. If you're interested, you'll find more at Countering systemic bias. Alarm 16:26, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Aboriginal expert

[edit]

Hi bellman, I notice that one of your friends is an expert in Aboriginal culture. I'm still trying to find out info on the Strathfield area... do you think he could help me out here? - Ta bu shi da yu 02:41, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Admin powers - alas not yet :(

[edit]

While Channel 7 may be playing Superman, alas I am not one yet :P I suspect I'll become admin in a few days! - Ta bu shi da yu 12:09, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

P.S. thanks for emailing your teacher for me... it's much appreciated! - Ta bu shi da yu 13:55, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Spanish Translation

[edit]

That sounds like an interesting project. That article has some rather advanced sentences, and some of the sentences that would be formed by the English translation might be awkward in an English article about this subject. Howevver, I will definitely help in whatever way I can. Academic Challenger 05:48, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The hope is that this spawns more translation efforts, between all of the different major languages. The bellman 05:59, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your invitation to translate bellman. I did a translation but fortunately Chamelon retranslated and he did a good job. I think I need more skill. Best regards--Jondel 11:15, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Cheers also for the invitation to help on the Spanish translation. Going through it now and it seems more or less very well translated :). Hauser

Thanks for the invite; the translation seemed pretty much complete, but there was definitely room for improvement in the English. I did some, there's still a bit more left to do (and in the Spanish version too, I think). @alex 02:43, 2004 Oct 26 (UTC)

Sorry, but I won't be able to do any work these days as I will have very little free time till mid-November or even December. Sabbut 19:08, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Your kind welcome

[edit]

Thanks so much for your kind welcome. I shall endeavor to be a helpful part of the community. I look forward to meeting everyone and getting involved in this great project. ;-) Jimbo Wales 05:16, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Wotcher

[edit]

Work at USyd, involved in left groups in Sydney, hang out with the latin american dance crew at UNcle. I'm happy to have my POV on APESMA changed, but APESMA has a reputation as an appeaser, a bosses' union, an inactive union, a "Professional association" with the historical connotations, a union opposed to industrial action in principle, a scab union (doesn't go out when the others onsite do), and a poacher (see for instance the AMWU's ambit in re engineers and other kindred professions). In terms of direct dealings, I know that APESMA does poorly by its student members. Happy to have my POV (and its obviously POV) countered. yours cordially, Fifelfoo 02:42, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

AMWU versus APESMA: Personal conversation with a mate of mine who was a worker (qualified and registered engineer) and union member. Left uni with an APESMA student membership conversion. On the basis of his experience, and recommendations from more senior engineers who were militants, went for the manufacturing. As far as the AMWU's ambit, see their white collar division section on their website. Obviously after this conversation I'll investigate more. Only problem is this kind of demarkation disputes don't get published in Workers Online etc.Fifelfoo 03:18, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Demarkation disputes: the Australian Industrial Relations Commission and state equivalents are meant to only register one union per industry. However, over time, the AIRC has shown a willingness to register unions representing, "All workers in the industry of hopping on the left foot while shearing a sheep," and then another union with, "All workers in the industry of hopping on the right foot while shearing a sheep." Sometimes there's more than two appropriate unions, for example, CPSU, NTEU, APESMA, HREA (now HSU, mostly kicked out of the sector), LHMU, NUS, AMWU, IEU, AEU, CFMEU, ASU (Services) all have some rights to enrol members working in industries which produce full-time education. It was even more of a mess before the great ACTU / ALP driven union mergers of the 1980s and 1990s. Fifelfoo 04:25, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Union: I chose the NTEU (my options were NTEU or CPSU). NTEU is an industrial union, its left wing, not ALP affiliated, not over run with faction fights. NTEU has excellent representation of casuals and general staff (the category when I started). NTEU does alot about being member driven, and was the workhorse behind the three strikes in the recent Enterprise Bargaining Agreement round. The NTEU branch has a rather good reputation. Fifelfoo 05:02, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Tri-lingual translation of the week

[edit]

Hi bellman,

Thank you for correct my user page! The text was bizarre – since I wrote it, I learned more about English.

About the camera, I don't have one, and even if a got, I lived in metropolitan region of São Paulo, not necessarily in the centre... I'll try to find a picture with sufficient resolution to print, but I'm more focused in finding something about the northeastern sertão.

The tri-lingual translation is a great idea. The pt Wikipedia has lots of articles translated from en, so it's hard to find articles about Latin America even there! I'm working in pt:Carnaval, and other specific themes about our people needs urgently to be developed. I think the project you're proposing could force the development of these articles. I'm on it. Marcelo R. 15:39, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hi Bellman, I made the Portuguese translation of your proposal. And I put it in your user space, hope you don't mind. Also I'm talking with people on pt about the project, too. C-ya, Marcelo R. 14:12, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Why did you blank this page? Lupo 10:41, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

A stupid mistake The bellman 22:50, 2004 Nov 12 (UTC)

South America pics for Wikijunior

[edit]

Not really a bunch, but enough I guess. They're at User:Pilaf/Pictures. Haven't got too many responses on the other Village Pumps, likely due to machine translated messages. Then again, there is a fair amount of French speaker that have listed themselves as being interested, so presume that's how they found out. And oy! That user page is confusing at first glance! -- user:zanimum

It's okay

[edit]
That's alright, It looks okay. People make mistakes. I don't hold anything against you. Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 02:17, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

U.S. embargo against Cuba

[edit]

You voted for U.S. embargo against Cuba, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.

Wikinews demo up and running

[edit]

Hi!

I'm writing to let you know that the Wikimedia Board of Trustees has approved the first stage of the Wikinews project. There's now a fully operational English demo site at demo.wikinews.org. This will be used for experimenting with various review models and basic policies before the site is launched officially in about a week. demo.wikinews.org will become the English version later.

You voted for the Wikinews project, so I'm asking for your participation now. Everything is open, nothing is final. What Wikinews will and can be depends in large part on you. There already is a global Wikinews mailing list for discussing the project. If you are interested at all, please subscribe -- coordination is of key importance. There's also an IRC channel #wikinews on irc.freenode.net. Realtime discussion can help to polish up articles.

If you're looking for something to do, check out the articles in development and articles in review. Or start a new story in the Wikinews workspace, or ignore the proposed review system - it's up to you. I hope you'll join us soon in this exciting experiment.--Eloquence* 01:58, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

es to en

[edit]

There's lots of good material in Spanish. I translate about one or two a week myself. Have people been having trouble finding articles worth translating? I made a couple of suggestions myself, but usually when I find things worth doing, I just jump in and translate. If it would be useful for me to come up with a list of articles worth translating, I'm sure I could come up with at least a dozen, probably more. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:26, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

a list like that would be great. The bellman 08:28, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC)
OK. They won't all be "featured", but they'll all be decent articles. Frankly, I haven't seen any sign that being "featured" in the Spanish Wikipedia means that the article is particularly good. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:30, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
so, what do you think of the notice board idea? The bellman 08:34, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC)
Feel free, but since I don't routinely log in to meta, I'd never see it on my watchlist, so I would never notice any changes to it. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:36, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

I've made considerable additions to the list. Let me know if you need even more, but I think this should be a decent pool. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:13, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

Wikireader

[edit]
Bellman, I've started slowly editing the articles and checking them, as opposed to expanding the stubs. If you'd like to do one or two a day to attempt to get some progress done, I'm marking each one this way (Lyellin checked). Thanks! Lyellin 01:30, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
Trust me... I'm the same way... wikinews (trying to be an admin), wikijunior I'm watching over a bit... some Pittsburgh articles here, and this wikireader... plus I'm just beginning an outline of one that will prove quite hard (will have inate POV issues)... I understand. But I'll bug. Lyellin 03:28, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
I like that idea a lot. I'll start doing that on the ones I've checked tomorrow. Also make sure to make it on the reader page, so we can keep track there. great idea though. WIsh I had thought of it. Lyellin 06:25, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
Quick Question. On that template you have to put on the wikreader page, you have both a user space and a space to sign. What's the user space for? Lyellin 17:39, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
Never mind. I just answered my own question :). Lyellin 22:46, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)

Desaparecidos move

[edit]

I think it's a good idea. I'm an admin and would be more than happy to delete the redirect for you. --David Iberri | Talk 17:22, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)

Sure I'll wait awhile. I'll periodically check Talk:Desaparecidos for comments.
P.S. Are you aware of Wikipedia:Requested moves? In all honesty, I personally prefer the way you're handling this (i.e. only involving prior contributors) but I suppose some might advocate the use of the project page instead. Plus, it's sometimes useful to get opinions from some fresh eyes. --David Iberri | Talk 06:45, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
Cool deal. Just letting you know about relevant pages and such. Like I said, I totally agree with how you're handling this. Please let me know when you'd like me to delete the redirect. --David Iberri | Talk 19:03, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
It's done. I'll let you have the honor of moving Desaparecidos to Desaparecidos (band). Best, David Iberri | Talk 05:26, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

You voted for Australian Aboriginal art, this week's Australian Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Thanks.

You voted for Murray River, this week's Australian Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Thanks.

U3

[edit]

g'day

Thanks for pointing that out. The anon seems to have replaced the existing article with the current list of stations (correct as of today). I've replaced the other info.

--Ianb 10:35, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)


Douglas Adams. Good taste indeed. :) Ambi 11:35, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)


Red Ensign

[edit]

Hello Bellman,

I really like the Australian and New Zealand Flags alot. Their respectively National Flags (Blue Ensigns) are both elagant and beautiful designs (in my POV). I also love their Red Ensign counterparts,


Australia Red Ensign(Merchant Ensign of the Navy)

http://flagspot.net/images/a/au-red.gif


New Zealand Red Ensign (Merchant Ensign of the Navy)

http://flagspot.net/images/n/nz_civil.gif


Proposed 1964 Canadian Red Ensign (Possible new National Flag)

http://scaa.usask.ca/gallery/flagdisplay/images/web/panel13-3.jpg


I really love this "Star Constillation" theme. The Australia and New Zealand Red Ensigns have the Southern Cross, and in kinship the (proposed) Canadian Red Ensign has Big Dipper.


I sincerely hope that the Red Ensign page will become unlocked someday, and your contributions Bellman, would be a true pleasure to read.


Sincerely,

ArmChairVexillologistDonArmchairVexillologistDon 17:50, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Red Ensign

[edit]

The Red Ensign article has been unprotected. AndyL 13:08, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Quechua

[edit]

Hi, Bellman! I have just read your message about the Quechua wikibook, because I haven't been around here for a long time. Thanx for ringing your bell to me with your suggestion. My main problem both right now and in general is lack of time but your message's been a truly nice surprise. Interesting thing, the Quechua wikibook. Too many interesting and pithy things everywhere in Wikiworld! As one of my friends told me in a really difficult time of my life "This world is beautiful because is diverse". That could be said as well about Wikiworld, and that diversity is one of the things that help me in difficult moments. I'll try and see if I can help when I get some time. Thanx once again! - Piolinfax 22:35, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Ipanema pictures

[edit]

In response to your question about my Ipanema photo (from a month ago), yes you can use it under CC-BY-SA. You can also help yourself to more at www.freewisdom.org/Brazil. You can tak any photos without identifiable people in them under CC-BY-SA.

- qaramazov, 2004/12/24

How to get to an interwiki redirect

[edit]

Ah, now you understand some of the bad things about interwiki redirects. You need to manually construct a url with &redirect=no at the end in the browser address bar, in the case of your wikibooks user page, it's at http://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=User:The_bellman&redirect=no . You'll also need to do it for your talk page at http://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_bellman&redirect=no . Gentgeen 09:47, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Wikinews Romanian articles

[edit]

I'm glad to hear you like the info on Romania! It's true that many people don't know much about it, and informing them is a great thing, even if they are from as far away as Australia :) I will continue to write about 2-3 articles a day about Romania. Cheers, Ronline 10:46, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) (BTW - do you know when the language versions for Wikinews will be launched. I'm looking forward to a version a Romanian!)

Wikinews Workspace war!

[edit]

What's your opinion on how the Workspace should, er, work? Amgine wants all stories to be listed at once on the front page, so other people start editing them. When we last tried that I found people were clicking red links and beginning to write articles I was already writing from scratch, just hadn't finished (so not saved) yet. This gave biiig edit conflicts. What's your opinion? Dan100 11:09, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

PS you should get proper user pages over on Wikinews! :)

he to they

[edit]

Hi bellman, I found your conversion of "he" to "they" http://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Gardening&diff=next&oldid=88553 . Besides the fact, that there is a mistake now (he becomes -> they becomes), it is after all a historic book. Should we suggest to let it be moved to WikiSource? What do you think... --Andreas Ipp 09:40, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC) --Andreas 09:38, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hey mate, great spotting. I should have been more careful with my edits. I guess we could move it to wikisource if you really wanted, but we shouldn't take it off wikibooks, cause the plan is that it will grow and become more the the out-of-copyright book that it is now. Large parts of wikipedia had thier base in a 1908 (?) version of britanica which is now out of copyright. The point was not to put the text of britanica online, but to have it as a starting point to create something bigger and better. The bellman 06:50, 2005 Jan 25 (UTC)

cheap drinks

[edit]

$1 beers? Might have to check it out. I'm not much of a beer person, myself, though. By the way, there's two places in close proximity to each other in Civic that regularly offer $2 spirits...which I discovered last night, and had to then get up and enrol this morning. Ambi 04:23, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I would like to revive Spanish Translation of the Week. Are you interested in working on it? — J3ff 05:54, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Darwin COTF

[edit]

I've just revived the COTW (now COTF), and Darwin is the next one off the block. You asked to be informed if it got up - it'd be nice to have some added participation there. It's been a while since we had a success story - it'd be nice to make this one of them. Ambi 08:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Sounds good to me. I could be able to help some - it'll depend on work and activist campaigns (most of which will be really building up around July 1, for obvious reasons). Have any other Canberrans been interested? (oh, and the other thing - I'm not familiar with the OR guidelines, but I'm a little privacy conscious, so if I can't remain anonymous, then I'm probably out) Ambi 14:09, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You uploaded onto the commons Image:Gyandendar-royaldress.jpg without a copyright tag... could you please add one? because... it's a nice image and if it is free it should be noted so that it doesn't get deleted. gren 04:50, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

wikibooks

[edit]

I have left you a message on your user page. Tuf-Kat 16:37, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Hello from Wikiquote

[edit]

Hello and thank you for your transwiki. I left a message also on your talk there. But I am sorry to say you didn't follow our transwiki procedure. Transwiki is not only a copy&paste from one to others. We have to record the original contributors following GFDL, and so on. And we like to record what were transwikied from wheer.

If you find another good candidate to transwiki, please consider to use q:Wikiquote:Transwiki log. Thanks. --Aphaea* 15:36, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Wikijunior name vote

[edit]

m:Wikijunior project name Voting will end June 6, 2005 at 11:30 am EST. -- user:Zanimum

You say :- (combat the stupid automatice date reversal thingo. who ever thought that was a good idea, really?)

What do you mean ? Dates are dates. Wizzy 07:36, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Image:French maoist poster of nepal.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:French maoist poster of nepal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Thuresson 07:03, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Book Club started

[edit]

Hi,

You requested I drop you a message after setting up the book club.

The completed collaboration page is located here Wikipedia Book Club

Regards, lots of issues | leave me a message 13:23, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Kiki designs

[edit]

Hope you'll visit Wikijunior project Nikki/Kiki character designs to discuss who's design is best. I've found a dozen talented people to create designs. -- user:zanimum

Danny Wool has challenged us to get Wikijunior Solar System out to hurricane evacuees by October 32005. This is going to be tough!

You expressed interest in WikiJunior. Would you be willing now to join the push to get Wikijunior Solar System completed? Come see Wikijunior Solar System!

Thanks --SV Resolution(Talk) 17:47, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

vegan substiutions on wikibooks

[edit]

Hi, a long while ago you had some objections to the listing of vegan products on the substitutions page on wikibooks. I have made a matrix, as you suggested, for various products by region. I'd like your comments on it. Thanks. Kellen T 04:18, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Skeleton in cave

[edit]

Your photo Skeleton in cave has me intrigued. Do you have any other photos, particularly of the skull, that may help to identify the animal? Rooivalk 13:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Taxobox-only articles: not a good idea

[edit]

Couldn't you find one sentence to say about the Southern Blue-ringed Octopus? Gdr 17:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly it's a wiki, secondly i'm planning on coming back to it. I don't have to do all my work in one go. The bellman 14:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

I think you can mark them for speedy deletion, but I'm not sure. Check Wikipedia:Copyright violations - I'd do it myself, but I'm in a massive rush. Ambi 21:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collosal Squid images

[edit]

None of those had a source, so I've gone ahead and deleted them. If they aren't a copyright issue, I'll ask XQ fan to reupload them after they have provided a source and proof that the copyright holder has released them to the public domain :-) Ta bu shi da yu 07:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Black smoker

[edit]

You've added "1.4 x 1014 kg of water is passed through black smokers each year.". Do you have any references about this ?

Help Desk Question

[edit]

Just in case you don't return to the help desk, I wanted to post you my reply since it took me a bit of work to type up.  :-)

I think you were right in the first place to dismiss this as a conspiracy theory. Here's why:
  1. Ford/GM/Pick-your-auto-company are in the business of selling cars. They are not in the business of selling oil or gasoline or desiel fuel. They have no interest in cars using up a lot of energy. It doesn't help them at all in their goal of selling more cars. In fact, it hurts their goal. The cost of buying the fuel has to be considered in the total cost of ownership for the vehicle. The higher the total cost of ownership, the fewer people can buy the car. If they want to sell more cars around the world, especially to developing nations where the people have less disposable income, then they want the total cost of ownership to be as low as possible.
  2. As pointed out above, the whole point of the patent system is that a company must disclose their invention in exchange for a limited monopoly. If they just let the invention sit there unused, one of 3 things will happen: (a) someone in another country with less respect for our intellectual property laws will just violate the patent (b) someone will sue the owner of the invention to force them to license it - again US law is designed around the notion of advancing society, so the courts are not sympathetic to people who lock up technology and refuse to license it (c) as soon as the patent expires, other people will bring the invention to market.
If we modify your question to suppose it was an an oil company, that the technology was not a more efficient car but rather a replacement for petroleum products, and that the invention was not patented but instead was held as a trade secret then this becomes a little more plausible. Still, oil companies are in competition with each other. They can't be sure that some other oil company on the other side of the world wouldn't independently invent the same thing. There is no security and no profit in keeping the invention hidden and not using it. They would be better off to take the invention to market and instantly make all their competitors obsolete. Johntex\talk 20:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BaxterTents.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 04:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fixed The bellman 02:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican Revolution

[edit]

I don't want an edit war here, but at Mexican Revolution you removed the "expert" template, claiming it "doesn't exist". Since the template exists—template:expert—and (as you can see from its edit history) existed at that time as well, I am guessing this was some kind of good-faith error and am asking you to restore it. But I won't fight over this. - Jmabel | Talk 19:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fixed The bellman 01:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self

[edit]

Merge backchannel and back-channel

+/-

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading [[:{{{1}}}]]. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BaxterTents.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 04:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BaxterPolice.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 16:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image needs a source. Bawolff 07:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

I'm saying it's not notable because it's a one-off joke. Now, if there was some kind of controversy over it, then it would be notable, but just because it's a crime doesn't make something automatically notable. -- Scorpion0422 04:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, a brief scene that implies Homer was raped is not really notable, even if it is a cartoon. We follow WP:PLOT, which says to basically keep a plot section brief and free of one-off jokes. In this case, the inclusion of it is trivia and a tad POVish because you think it is notable despite being brief. So, in order to prove the notability, you would have to find a reliable source which says the scene is notable and thus there is some real world context. -- Scorpion0422 07:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on MAX (operating system), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because MAX (operating system) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting MAX (operating system), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Molinux, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Molinux and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Equipoisenow (talk) 22:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that that counts as WP:PLAGIARISM, but it was definitely being used inappropriately - thanks. Also, if I recall correctly, Medical News Today is not really a great source per WP:MEDRS, so feel free to word around any other instances you run across. - 2/0 (cont.) 00:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello The bellman! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Peter Robb - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Cave onyx

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cave onyx , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Kleopatra (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to the Canberra WikiMeetup on 20 November 2011

[edit]

Hi! We're having a Canberra Wikimeetup on 20 November 2011 at Siren Bar in Gunghalin from 2pm to 4pm. It's most just a chance to chat with other local Wikipedians, get a chance to go a different sort of bar (which is reasonably kid friendly, serves real food, and has non-alcholic options), and, if you're interested, learning more about what Wikimedia Australia and local GLAM projects are happening. We'd love to see you and any Wikipedia/Wikimedia/wiki loving friends you have there. --LauraHale (talk) 07:23, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article MAX (operating system) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a Spanish Linux distribution without notable English sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EvilKeyboardCat (talk) 11:48, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup invitation: January 2013

[edit]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.

Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Canberra meetup invitation: February 2013

[edit]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.

Details and attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup invitation

[edit]

Hi, you're invited to the Canberra meetup which will take place at King O'Malley's Irish Pub in Civic on 17 February 2016. Bidgee (talk) 02:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup invitation (August 2016)

[edit]

I'll be in Canberra from the 29-30 August, there is a planned meet-up at King O'Malley's (though I'm open to suggestions) from 6pm on the 29 August. Sorry for the short noticed, only had the trip confirmed this afternoon. Bidgee (talk) 11:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, The bellman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup

[edit]

Hi, there will be a meetup in Canberra on the 20 January 2018 at 7pm, I hope you're able to make it but understand that this is very short notice. Bidgee (talk) 22:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centerlink is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centerlink until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sheldybett (talk) 11:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, The bellman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]