User talk:Mjsedgwick
terrorism definition
[edit]I reverted your changes to the terrorism article, I don't think words like "for example" should be used at the top of the section that is trying to succinctly define a word, especially considering the word has multiple definitions and it seemed too verbose. Though, after reading your changes again I kind of see what you are trying to getting at, perhaps that info should be included further down in the article? Let's discuss on that article's talk page. zen master T 08:46, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Avrohom Shmulevitz
[edit]Professor, I am proposing the deletion of your article on Avrohom Shmuevitz. I looked though his website and his livejournal (I am a Russian-speaking Orthodox Jew) and I came to the conclusion that this "rabbi" of unknown religious provenance is the leader of a non-notable gang of "hyperzionist" hoodlums. I am not sure what leads you to believe that he is notable, but please feel free to write to me on my talk page if you object to his deletion. Crzrussian 20:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the Evola article. It's nice to have the assistance of an expert. —Morning star 17:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank You
[edit]Thank you for adding to Sufi studies. Looking forward to further contributions. Take care. (Lunarian)
Enticement ?
[edit]Professor, I made some additions to Sufi studies that you may want to look at. They are also meant to entice you to further contribute to the article. Thanks for your benevolent attention. (Lunarian)
Thank you very much. I had not meant to put you to so much trouble. The edit is all the better for it. The Ahmad al-Alawi link was equally valuable... We are bound to meet again. It's a privilege.
- P.S Are you working on a Jossot wiki? If not it would be no trouble for me to look him up in a painter's index...
- P.P.S I linked Gotthold Ephraim Lessing to Johann Jacob Reiske (I noted perhaps)...
(Lunarian 10:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC))
I had a go at Jossot and I also put a remark on Talk:Rudolf von Sebottendorf. Maybe you would like to comment too.
- à bientot ? (Lunarian 18:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC))
A Million
[edit]Thanks a million. Great progress on some real study. Dinet's next but I'm not going to disturb you. Entirely in debt to you for gratitude. (Lunarian 11:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC))
Glad to see you're still around!
[edit]How's everything? How's that book of uber-nationalism coming along? See ya. - CrazyRussian talk/email 22:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to give you my comments on it, if you care for it. I am sure it could benefit from a fresh Haredi-Russian-American perspecitve :) - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Howdy, I noticed that you and I seem to post in one or two articles dealing with progressive issues in political science/sociology. There's currently a debate beginning in Boston Tea Party as to whether the article should include the category [1]. It meets definitions set in the articles Terrorism and Definition of terrorism, however, there are several self-proclaimed patriots who watch BTP who refuse to recognise the fact. The simple criteria for terrorism generally seem to be intimidation or destruction of property in order to change public policy or public opinion while a state of war has not yet been declared. Some users would rather use recent acts of terrorism as a yardstick, rather than using a firm definition, and hence lose their ability to discuss matters calmly. Would you be able to pop in to the Talk page and join in the discussion? Thanks much, samwaltz 05:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
The article Idrisis of Asir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No useful purpose, unreferenced single sentence article, no context, could possibly be redirected to Emirate of Asir.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Mjsedgwick! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 144 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Jean-Pierre Laurant - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Avraham Shmulevich for deletion
[edit]
The article Avraham Shmulevich is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avraham Shmulevich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 03:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Lucy Seton-Watson for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucy Seton-Watson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Seton-Watson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alois Kalvoda, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint Louis and Naturalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virgil Meneghello Dinčić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:35, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmad ibn Idris al-Fasi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Mjsedgwick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)